India could move toward much tighter monitoring of cryptocurrency transactions as a parliamentary panel prepares recommendations on how the country should deal with virtual digital assets.
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, chaired by Bhartruhari Mahtab, has spent more than a year examining cryptocurrencies, NFTs and the wider digital-asset ecosystem.
The panel is now preparing a report for submission to the Lok Sabha Speaker and may recommend stronger transaction surveillance, greater use of technology to trace digital assets and wider consultations on their legal treatment.
The recommendations have not yet been finalised and do not amount to a new law.
FCRF Launches CP-FRM to Build India’s Next Generation of Fraud Risk Professionals
Panel Has Examined Crypto Sector for More Than a Year
According to The Economic Times, the committee has held more than half a dozen meetings on Virtual Digital Assets, or VDAs.
The term is used in Indian law to cover assets such as cryptocurrencies and certain non-fungible tokens.
The panel has examined the sector from multiple angles, including regulation, transaction monitoring and the legal status of such assets.
Among the proposals now under consideration is a stronger system for monitoring cryptocurrency transactions.
The committee may also ask the government to deploy newer technological tools capable of tracking the movement of digital assets across wallets, exchanges and other platforms.
Why Tracking Crypto Transactions Is Difficult
Cryptocurrency transfers can move across multiple wallets and platforms within minutes.
Some transactions take place through regulated exchanges, while others occur through overseas platforms, private wallets or peer-to-peer transfers.
This can make traditional financial monitoring more difficult.
Unlike a normal bank transfer, a crypto transaction may involve wallet addresses rather than conventional account numbers and can move across jurisdictions without relying on a single financial institution.
Blockchain transactions are often visible on public ledgers, but identifying the real person behind a wallet can still require additional information from exchanges, banks and other intermediaries.
That is why transaction-monitoring technology has become an important part of anti-money-laundering enforcement.
India Already Requires Crypto Platforms to Follow PMLA Rules
India does not have a comprehensive standalone cryptocurrency law.
However, crypto service providers are already subject to significant anti-money-laundering requirements.
In March 2023, the government brought Virtual Digital Asset Service Providers within the Prevention of Money Laundering Act framework.
Platforms involved in exchanging crypto for fiat currency, transferring VDAs, safeguarding digital assets or providing related financial services are required to register with the Financial Intelligence Unit-India when they serve Indian users.
They must maintain records, conduct customer verification and report suspicious transactions.
FIU-IND guidelines also require virtual-asset service providers to develop systems for detecting money laundering, terrorist financing and other suspicious activity.
These obligations apply based on the services being provided, not merely on whether the company has a physical office in India.
FIU Recently Issued Notices to 15 Crypto Platforms
The parliamentary discussion comes as enforcement against non-compliant platforms is already increasing.
On September 9, FIU-IND issued non-compliance notices to 15 Virtual Digital Asset Service Providers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
The list included platforms such as Weex, Blofin, Bitunix, DigiFinex, Toobit, XT.com, Latoken and WOO X.
The action followed earlier enforcement against offshore crypto exchanges operating in India without registering with FIU-IND.
In October 2025, FIU-IND said 50 VDA service providers had registered with it and reiterated that offshore platforms serving Indian customers must also comply with Indian AML obligations.
This shows that India already has a surveillance and reporting framework for crypto businesses even though the wider regulatory status of private cryptocurrencies remains unresolved.
Taxation Exists, but Regulation Is Still Fragmented
India also taxes cryptocurrency transactions.
Income from the transfer of Virtual Digital Assets is subject to a 30% tax under the framework introduced in the 2022 Union Budget.
A 1% tax deducted at source was also introduced on qualifying VDA transactions to create a transaction trail.
But taxation does not amount to legal recognition or full regulation of cryptocurrencies as a financial asset class.
The government has repeatedly maintained that crypto assets are borderless and that effective regulation requires international coordination.
The Economic Times reported that the parliamentary panel is likely to examine precisely this gap: India can tax and monitor crypto transactions, but it still lacks a comprehensive legal framework governing the assets themselves.
Panel May Seek Wider Consultation Before Any New Law
Another recommendation under consideration is broader consultation over how cryptocurrencies should be treated legally.
That could involve regulators, enforcement agencies, technology specialists, financial institutions and industry participants.
India has so far avoided taking either of the two extreme positions — a complete legalisation framework or a blanket prohibition on private cryptocurrencies.
Instead, authorities have focused on taxation, anti-money-laundering compliance and enforcement against unregistered platforms.
The committee’s report could influence whether the government eventually moves toward a more formal regulatory framework.
But any such decision would require separate government action and, depending on the approach chosen, potentially new legislation.
Government Continues to Warn Investors About Risk
The Finance Ministry has also continued to warn that cryptocurrencies and NFTs remain highly risky.
It has said users may not have the same regulatory protections available in conventional financial markets if an exchange collapses, assets are stolen or an investment fails.
That warning remains relevant even when a platform is registered with FIU-IND.
FIU registration primarily relates to anti-money-laundering compliance. It does not amount to government approval of a crypto asset or guarantee that investors will recover losses.
Monitoring Could Extend Beyond Centralised Exchanges
If the committee recommends stronger technological surveillance, one challenge will be transactions that occur outside conventional exchanges.
Centralised exchanges can identify customers through KYC records.
Private or self-custody wallets, decentralised platforms and peer-to-peer transactions can be harder to associate immediately with a real-world identity.
Indian agencies have already begun building capabilities in this area.
FIU guidelines require VDA service providers to monitor transactions and implement mechanisms for identifying suspicious behaviour.
The420.in has also previously reported that India is developing stronger virtual-asset monitoring capabilities for detecting offshore and illegal crypto activity.
The parliamentary panel’s recommendations could push that approach further.
No New Crypto Law Has Been Announced Yet
For investors, the most important distinction is between a recommendation and a rule.
The Standing Committee is preparing its report.
It has not announced a ban, licensing framework or new transaction-monitoring requirement.
The government would need to evaluate any recommendations and decide whether to act on them.
Until then, India’s current framework remains centred on taxation, FIU registration, PMLA compliance and enforcement against platforms that fail to meet those obligations.
What this means for you
Crypto transactions in India are becoming easier for authorities to trace through tax records, exchange KYC data and anti-money-laundering reporting. Investors should not assume that transactions using crypto wallets or offshore platforms are invisible simply because no comprehensive cryptocurrency law exists yet.
Follow for daily updates on cybercrime, corporate fraud, DFIR, hacking, investigations, and digital forensics
