The Ministry of Electronics and IT has summoned Meta's global leadership after Facebook temporarily restricted a video post by PM Narendra Modi, rejecting the company's automated glitch explanation.

MeitY Rejects Meta Apology Over Deleted PM Modi Video and Demands Executive Explanation

The420 Web Correspondent
6 Min Read

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has summoned the global leadership of US tech giant Meta following the temporary restriction and removal of a video posted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Facebook and Instagram. Displeased with Meta’s preliminary explanation citing an automated system error, the Indian government has demanded the presence of senior international executives, including Meta’s global head of public policy, to explain content moderation practices and address persistent compliance disputes under India’s digital regulations. The government underscored that the brief apology issued by the social media firm was insufficient and that the matter remains far from settled.

Details of the Video Restriction and Meta’s Automated Error Claim

The controversial incident unfolded after Prime Minister Modi uploaded a three-minute direct selfie video on July 23, 2026, aimed at engaging with young citizens and addressing nationwide student concerns surrounding examination irregularities and paper leaks. In the video, which garnered hundreds of millions of views across social platforms, the Prime Minister assured students that a stringent bill containing provisions for severe penalties against paper leaks would be introduced in Parliament. Shortly after publication, however, the video was temporarily blocked on Facebook in India, displaying automated error messages citing regional unavailability and purported legal requests.

Meta subsequently restored the video and issued a public statement apologizing for the disruption, attributing the takedown to an accidental glitch in its automated content moderation filters. Despite Meta’s assertion that the content was removed inadvertently and promptly reinstated, the Indian government rejected the explanation as unreasonable. Government officials emphasized that for a platform possessing sophisticated recommendation and moderation algorithms, automated filters should easily differentiate official communications of heads of government from unauthorized or infringing content.

Communication Breakdown and Direct Engagement with US Leadership

Senior officials from MeitY, led by IT Secretary S. Krishnan, expressed growing dissatisfaction with Meta’s local policy representatives in India. Government sources indicated that repeated engagements with the local policy team failed to effectively communicate the severity of India’s regulatory concerns to Meta’s top executive leadership at its headquarters in California. Consequently, MeitY issued direct summons to global executives, including Meta’s Global Affairs President Joel Kaplan and Instagram Head Adam Mosseri, requiring high-level representation to establish clearer accountability.

The Ministry emphasized that Meta must upgrade its automated moderation tools to prevent similar errors in the future, particularly those affecting high-profile constitutional authorities. Officials noted that Meta claimed to have implemented new protocols for accounts belonging to prominent public figures to avert future mishaps. However, MeitY maintains that broader systemic discussions are imperative to understand the precise mechanics behind content suppression and the internal escalation channels utilized by the platform.

Expanding Regulatory Scrutiny and Platform Compliance

The summons over the Prime Minister’s video coincides with intensified regulatory oversight on multiple fronts concerning Meta’s family of applications. MeitY recently issued formal notices to WhatsApp regarding its proposed username feature, raising serious concerns that masking phone numbers could facilitate online fraud, digital arrest scams, impersonation attacks, and phishing operations across India. Additionally, the government delivered a stern directive to Instagram regarding the presence of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) and paid advertisements promoting access to explicit content, demanding immediate enforcement, content removal, and comprehensive compliance reporting.

Furthermore, the government has questioned Meta regarding its compliance with the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, particularly concerning deepfakes, synthetic AI-generated media, and user data privacy. Recent controversies involving Meta’s generative AI tools have drawn sharp criticism, prompting MeitY to scrutinize data scraping and consent frameworks to ensure strict adherence to domestic data protection laws.

Parliamentary Panel Action and Future Directions

In tandem with executive actions by MeitY, the legislative branch has stepped up scrutiny. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology, chaired by Member of Parliament Nishikant Dubey, has summoned representatives from Meta, X, Google, and Snapchat to appear before the panel on August 3. The parliamentary committee intends to examine how major technology platforms protect user privacy—specifically regarding women, children, rural communities, and laborers—and maintain public order in alignment with state guidelines.

The government’s decisive stance underscores a broader tightening of digital governance in India. As MeitY prepares to amend the IT Rules to mandate shorter takedown timelines and enforce stricter due diligence standards on social media intermediaries, technology giants operating within the country face growing pressure to align their automated moderation systems and executive governance with national regulatory frameworks.

Stay Connected