Mumbai: In a major development in a high-value cyber fraud case, a Mumbai Sessions Court has granted bail to Aurangabad-based businessman Chishti Ahteshamuddin, an accused in the alleged ₹58.1 crore “digital arrest” scam. The case involves accusations that a senior citizen was intimidated by fraudsters posing as officials of central investigative and regulatory agencies and coerced into transferring huge sums into multiple bank accounts.
While granting bail, the court observed that the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time and keeping the accused in custody for an indefinite period would not be justified. The court further noted that at this stage of proceedings, continued detention was not necessary given the nature of the evidence and ongoing investigation.
FCRF Returns With CDPO, Its Premier Data Protection Certification for Privacy Professionals
The case stems from a complaint in which the victim alleged that cyber criminals impersonated officials of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The victim was allegedly threatened with serious criminal charges and placed under what is being described as a “digital arrest” situation, where continuous psychological pressure was used to extract money.
How the ‘Digital Arrest’ Trap Was Executed
According to court records and submissions, the accused and associates repeatedly contacted the victim through WhatsApp calls, video calls, and messages, claiming that a serious case had been registered against him. The victim was allegedly told that immediate cooperation was required to avoid arrest and further legal consequences.
This tactic, commonly referred to as “digital arrest,” does not involve any physical detention but creates a strong psychological illusion of being under official custody. Under this sustained pressure, the victim was allegedly forced to transfer ₹58.1 crore into various bank accounts controlled by the accused network.
Defence Argument and Court Observation
The defence counsel for Chishti Ahteshamuddin argued before the court that the funds received in the accused’s accounts were part of legitimate business transactions and not proceeds of any criminal activity. The defence submitted WhatsApp chats, emails, and financial records to support the claim that the amounts were linked to prior commercial dealings.
Additional Sessions Judge Nitin V. Jiwane, while considering the bail plea, observed that based on the material available at this stage, it could not be conclusively stated that all transactions were directly linked to criminal activity. The court also emphasized that the investigation and trial would be prolonged, and therefore continued custody was not warranted at this stage.
Widespread Arrests and Ongoing Investigation
Authorities have so far arrested 33 individuals connected to the case, spanning Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Aurangabad. Investigators believe the scam may be part of a larger organized cybercrime network operating through fake identities, financial layering, and digital communication platforms to defraud victims on a massive scale. A chargesheet has already been filed in the case.
Cyber Expert Warning on Rising Threat
Cybersecurity experts, including renowned cybercrime specialist and former IPS officer Professor Triveni Singh, have warned that “‘Digital arrest’ scams are among the fastest-growing cybercrime patterns in India. He noted that criminals increasingly impersonate government agencies to instill fear and use psychological manipulation to extract large sums of money”.
According to him, “Senior citizens remain the most vulnerable targets due to their higher trust in official-sounding communication and limited familiarity with modern fraud tactics. He emphasized that any claim involving arrest, investigation, or urgent legal action must always be verified through official channels before taking any response”.
Growing Concern Over Digital Arrest Frauds
Experts highlight that lack of awareness and fear-based manipulation make these scams particularly dangerous. Once victims fall into psychological pressure, fraudsters systematically extract funds while making the transactions difficult to trace and recover.
