A recent audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has identified significant shortcomings in skill development initiatives implemented by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). The report, tabled in Parliament, points to issues including duplicate enrolments, weak data validation systems, low placement outcomes, and delays in certification processes, raising concerns over the effectiveness of these schemes.
Multiple Enrolments and Data Validation Issues
The audit found that several candidates were registered multiple times using similar demographic details, indicating weak controls in maintaining beneficiary uniqueness. According to the report, “issues were noted in maintaining the uniqueness of beneficiaries due to instances of multiple registrations of candidates with similar demographic details.”
FCRF Launches Premier CISO Certification Amid Rising Demand for Cybersecurity Leadership
Further, the registration portals lacked provisions for uploading supporting documents, leading to data validation gaps and the inclusion of invalid entries. These deficiencies raise concerns about the integrity of beneficiary databases and the reliability of reported outcomes.
Low Placement Rates and Limited Industry Recognition
Despite significant enrolment and certification numbers, the audit highlighted modest placement outcomes across schemes. It noted that placement levels remained low compared to the number of trained candidates.
In the Future Skills PRIME (FSP) programme, the CAG observed low enrolment in advanced courses and a lack of industry recognition for certifications. This, in turn, impacted learner motivation and reduced the employability benefits of the programme.
Delays in Certification and Implementation Gaps
The report flagged delays in assessments and issuance of certificates, which affected the timely progression of beneficiaries. It also highlighted the delayed implementation of the “Place and Train” model, limiting employment opportunities for already certified candidates.
Additionally, trainee tracking was conducted for only three months instead of the prescribed one year, reducing the ability to assess long-term outcomes. Reimbursement claims submitted by training partners were also found to be pending for extended periods, indicating administrative inefficiencies.
Gaps in Scheme Coverage and Execution
Under the Skill Development of Youth in Aspirational Districts (SDYAD) scheme, the audit found that training partners could not be engaged in several districts, resulting in zero enrolment in those areas.
The report concluded that while the schemes achieved substantial outreach and training coverage, gaps in implementation, monitoring, and fund management hindered the full realization of intended outcomes, particularly in improving employability and ensuring timely certification.
The CAG’s findings underscore systemic issues in the design and execution of MeitY’s skill development programmes. Persistent data inconsistencies, weak monitoring frameworks, and limited employment linkages highlight the need for stronger oversight, improved digital infrastructure, and better industry alignment to ensure meaningful outcomes for beneficiaries.
About the author – Ayesha Aayat is a law student and contributor covering cybercrime, online frauds, and digital safety concerns. Her writing aims to raise awareness about evolving cyber threats and legal responses.
