Kerala minister O. J. Janeesh has demanded a DGP-level probe into alleged PSC recruitment fraud linked to the State Planning Board. He alleged attempts to dilute the inquiry and raised concerns over backdoor appointments and recruitment transparency.

Kerala Minister Seeks DGP-Level Probe Into PSC Recruitment Fraud Claims

The420 Correspondent
5 Min Read

Thiruvananthapuram | A political controversy has intensified in Kerala over allegations of recruitment irregularities linked to the State Planning Board. State Sports and Youth Affairs Minister O. J. Janeesh has alleged that the current leadership of the Kerala Public Service Commission (PSC) is attempting to derail a comprehensive investigation into the alleged recruitment fraud. He has called for an independent, high-level inquiry led by an officer of the rank of Director General of Police (DGP).

Speaking to the media, the minister said that after the allegations surfaced, the PSC initially ordered only an internal vigilance inquiry, which he described as inadequate. He further alleged that the investigation was later entrusted to the Controller of Examinations, a move that, according to him, undermined the possibility of a thorough and independent probe. Janeesh argued that if allegations regarding the Controller of Examinations’ role are also under question, assigning the investigation to the same office raises concerns about the credibility and impartiality of the inquiry.

Registration Begins for FutureCrime Summit 2026, India’s Largest Cybercrime Conference

The minister said that if the allegations against the Controller of Examinations prove to be true, it would amount to “handing the keys to the thief.” He stressed that only an independent, high-level investigation could restore public confidence and reassure thousands of job aspirants about the integrity of the recruitment process.

Janeesh said that, in his capacity as the State Youth Congress president, he had submitted a memorandum to the Chief Minister seeking a DGP-level investigation into the matter. According to him, every aspect of the alleged recruitment irregularities must be examined so that responsibility can be fixed if any violations of rules are established.

The minister also alleged that backdoor appointments had been taking place in the PSC over the past decade, severely affecting the credibility of the constitutional body. He maintained that if the allegations are substantiated during the investigation, the matter would constitute not merely an administrative lapse but a serious criminal offence warranting strict legal action.

He further stated that any official, employee, or individual found guilty during the investigation should face stringent action under the law. He added that if any person is found to have secured government employment through illegal means, appropriate action should be taken in accordance with applicable service rules and legal provisions.

Janeesh also said that the government remains committed to protecting the interests of genuine and deserving job aspirants. He noted that lakhs of candidates rely on a transparent recruitment process for public employment and that any irregularities undermine the opportunities of honest applicants.

Meanwhile, the Kerala Public Service Commission has not yet issued a detailed official response to the allegations. The issue has triggered a wider political debate, with various stakeholders demanding a fair and impartial investigation. The future course of action will depend on decisions taken by the state government and the competent investigating authorities.

Administrative and legal experts have observed that transparency, accountability, and independent oversight are essential to maintaining public confidence in recruitment agencies. They note that whenever allegations of recruitment irregularities arise, all relevant records, selection procedures, digital evidence, and the role of officials should be examined objectively to establish the facts and ensure appropriate legal action.

The investigation has not yet reached any final conclusions. All allegations remain under examination, and any determination of criminal liability or administrative wrongdoing will depend on the outcome of the investigation and subsequent judicial and statutory proceedings.

About the author — Suvedita Nath is a science student with a growing interest in cybercrime and digital safety. She writes on online activity, cyber threats, and technology-driven risks. Her work focuses on clarity, accuracy, and public awareness.

Stay Connected