A fresh controversy over research ethics has emerged at the Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS), Banaras Hindu University (BHU), after a senior faculty member alleged that a scientific study conducted under his supervision was published by resident doctors without acknowledging his contribution. The dispute has raised serious questions about academic integrity, authorship practices, and research governance within one of India’s leading medical institutions.
Registration Begins for FutureCrime Summit 2026, India’s Largest Cybercrime Conference
Allegations of Intellectual Theft
The allegations have been made by Prof. Amit Rastogi, a senior orthopaedic surgeon and researcher at BHU’s Trauma Centre. According to Prof. Rastogi, a research project related to fracture management and associated medical procedures was carried out under his guidance. However, he claims that after the work was completed, a senior resident doctor, along with other residents from the department, submitted and published the study in a scientific journal under their own names while excluding the original researcher from the authorship list.
The controversy came to light after Prof. Rastogi was reportedly informed by colleagues and well-wishers that a paper based on his research had already been published. Upon reviewing the publication, he allegedly discovered that his name was not included among the authors despite his claimed role in designing and conducting the study. He subsequently lodged a formal complaint with university authorities, objecting to what he described as a serious violation of research ethics.
According to the professor, the study was being conducted during the same period in which a senior resident was preparing an academic thesis. He alleges that the research findings were later incorporated into a journal publication without appropriate acknowledgment of the actual contributors. The complaint has triggered an institutional review into the circumstances under which the paper was submitted and published.
Strict Academic Guidelines
Authorship is considered one of the most important aspects of academic and scientific publishing. International research guidelines generally require that all individuals who make substantial intellectual, analytical, or scientific contributions to a study receive proper credit. Excluding a genuine contributor or assigning authorship inappropriately is widely regarded as a breach of academic ethics and professional standards.
Following the complaint, the matter was referred to the university’s research administration. Prof. Manoj Pandey, Dean of Research at IMS-BHU, has confirmed that a complaint has been received and forwarded for further action. Meanwhile, IMS-BHU Director Prof. S.N. Shankhwar has stated that an inquiry is underway and that the final position will become clear once the investigation is completed.
Potential Journal Retraction
The inquiry is expected to examine the entire research process, including study design, data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, and publication procedures. Investigators will reportedly assess whether established authorship guidelines were followed and determine the extent of each individual’s contribution to the research.
Sources familiar with the matter indicate that if the allegations are found to have merit, the institution may formally approach the scientific journal concerned and request the retraction of the disputed article. In academic publishing, a retraction is considered a significant corrective measure and is typically used in cases involving ethical violations, data irregularities, plagiarism, or authorship disputes.
Institutional Precedents and Accountability
The incident has drawn additional attention because it is not the first research-related controversy to emerge from IMS-BHU in recent years. According to institutional records, objections were reportedly raised against seven research papers over the past year, resulting in the withdrawal of three published studies. Those cases involved allegations ranging from plagiarism and image-related concerns to the alleged reuse of previously published research data.
Academic experts note that maintaining trust in scientific research requires strict adherence to ethical standards governing authorship, data integrity, transparency, and publication practices. They argue that universities and medical institutions must ensure robust oversight mechanisms to prevent disputes that could undermine the credibility of research output.
For now, the focus remains on the outcome of the ongoing inquiry. The findings are expected to determine not only the future of the disputed publication but also whether any disciplinary or corrective action will be recommended. The case has once again highlighted the growing importance of research ethics and accountability in higher education and medical research institutions.
