Ahmedabad. A fraud complaint has surfaced from the Vellal area of Ahmedabad district, where a couple operating a mineral water plant has been accused of taking advance payments from traders and failing to supply the ordered goods. The allegations involve a plant reportedly run by Nilesh Delwadiya and his wife, Ashmita, with authorities now examining transaction records and payment details.
Advance Payment Taken for Bulk Supply
According to sources, a trader from the Paldi area involved in the mineral water business approached the plant in the industrial park of Vellal to secure supply for the upcoming season. During discussions, the couple allegedly assured him that they had enough production capacity to fulfil bulk orders on time.
FCRF Academy Launches Premier Anti-Money Laundering Certification Program
Trusting the assurance, the trader placed an order for around 10,000 boxes of mineral water and paid a substantial amount in advance. However, the goods were allegedly not supplied even after the agreed deadline, and the money was not returned.
Threat Allegations After Refund Demand
The complainant alleged that when he demanded a refund, Nilesh Delwadiya refused to return the amount and issued threats. It was further alleged that the accused warned that false cases could be filed if pressure was applied.
The allegations have caused concern among traders in the area. Sources said there are local discussions that similar financial irregularity claims had surfaced against the couple earlier, though the full extent is still being examined.
Probe Examines Possible Wider Pattern
It is alleged that the couple may have taken advance payments from several traders using a similar pattern while failing to deliver goods. Preliminary scrutiny suggests that the matter could involve transactions running into several lakhs of rupees.
Following the complaint, investigators have begun examining documents, transaction records and payment details. Authorities are also looking into whether more traders were affected by the alleged conduct.
The case has raised questions over advance-payment practices in commercial dealings and the need for stronger verification and documentation. The investigation is ongoing, and further details may emerge if more affected traders come forward.