Economic offences investigators arrest Reliance Power CFO and two others in an alleged multi-crore tender fraud linked to forged bank guarantees in a government solar project.

Reliance Power CFO Among 3 Arrested in Multi-Crore Tender Fraud Case

The420.in Staff
4 Min Read

New Delhi: In a significant crackdown on alleged financial misconduct in public procurement, economic offences investigators have arrested the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Reliance Power, along with two others, for their suspected role in a multi-crore tender fraud. The case centres on the use of forged bank guarantees and fabricated documents to secure a government contract, raising serious concerns about transparency and corporate governance in high-value infrastructure projects.

Forged bank guarantees allegedly used to crack a high-stakes solar tender

The accused have been identified as Ashok Kumar Pal (50), serving as CFO of Reliance Power; Partha Sarathi Biswal (54), Managing Director of Odisha-based Biswal Tradelink Pvt Ltd; and Amarnath Dutta (50), a Kolkata-based associate. All three were taken into custody on April 15 and have since been remanded for further interrogation as investigators attempt to piece together the full extent of the alleged fraud.

According to preliminary findings, the case is linked to a major government tender in the solar energy sector. The complaint was filed by a manager associated with Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), who flagged serious discrepancies in the documentation submitted during the bidding process. Authorities suspect that forged bank guarantees were used to falsely meet eligibility criteria, enabling the accused entities to gain an unfair advantage.

FCRF Returns With CDPO, Its Premier Data Protection Certification for Privacy Professionals

Digital trail of emails and money records points to a planned conspiracy

Investigators say the accused acted in a coordinated manner, allegedly manipulating documents and engineering counterfeit financial instruments to bypass technical and financial scrutiny. Digital evidence, including email exchanges, financial transaction records, and communication trails, is currently under examination. These materials are believed to indicate a premeditated and structured conspiracy rather than an isolated incident.

Sources indicate that the operation may have involved multiple layers of coordination between different entities, suggesting possible collusion among firms to influence the tender outcome. Officials are now exploring whether similar methods were used in other projects, raising the possibility that this case could be part of a broader pattern of procurement fraud.

Experts note that such incidents can significantly undermine confidence in government contracting systems. When fraudulent practices infiltrate critical sectors like renewable energy, they not only distort fair competition but also jeopardize investor trust and project execution timelines. Strengthening due diligence and verification mechanisms, particularly for financial documentation such as bank guarantees, is increasingly seen as essential.

Another critical angle under scrutiny is the role of the banking system. Investigators are examining whether any lapses, oversight failures, or internal complicity allowed forged guarantees to be accepted as legitimate. Should evidence of such failures emerge, the scope of the probe could widen, potentially leading to further action against additional individuals or entities.

Investigators are now scanning banking lapses and corporate nexus

At present, interrogation of the three accused is ongoing, with investigators focusing on connecting digital and financial evidence to establish the full chain of events. Authorities maintain that uncovering the entire network behind the alleged fraud is a priority, not only to ensure accountability but also to prevent similar schemes in the future.

The development comes at a time when India is witnessing substantial investments in infrastructure and renewable energy projects. In such a landscape, ensuring fairness, transparency, and integrity in the tendering process is critical. This case serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities that persist and the urgent need to strengthen oversight mechanisms to safeguard public funds and institutional credibility.

Stay Connected