A ₹50.8 crore jewellery deal fraud case in Hyderabad has triggered a police probe over alleged fund diversion, broken promises and a disputed profit-share agreement.

₹50 Crore Fraud in the Name of Profit Share: Major Jewellery Deal Scam Exposed

The420.in Staff
5 Min Read

Hyderabad: A high-profile fraud case linked to a jewellery deal has surfaced in Telangana’s capital, Hyderabad, where a businessman has alleged cheating to the tune of ₹50.8 crore. The accused allegedly lured him with promises of securing the release of jewellery boxes from government custody and offering him a share in the assets. A criminal case has now been registered against two individuals, and an investigation is underway.

₹50.8 Crore Paid on Promise of a Lucrative Jewellery Share

According to the complainant, Rajesh Agarwal, the accused—Mohammad Zakir Osman and Sukesh Gupta—approached him in 2016 claiming they were in the process of securing the release of five jewellery boxes held under government custody. They sought financial and administrative assistance, assuring him that he would receive a legitimate share once the jewellery was released.

FCRF Returns With CDPO, Its Premier Data Protection Certification for Privacy Professionals

MoU in Place, But Assets Allegedly Released Behind the Investor’s Back

Trusting their assurances, Agarwal signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on October 3, 2016. As per the agreement, he agreed to provide financial assistance solely for facilitating the release of the jewellery. Between June 2016 and February 2018, he allegedly transferred ₹50.8 crore to multiple entities—Aashi Realtors, MBS Jewellers Pvt Ltd, and MBS Impex Pvt Ltd—which were reportedly owned or controlled by Sukesh Gupta.

Fund Diversion and Breach of Trust Add Twist to High-Stakes Deal

The complaint states that after considerable effort and financial investment, the Telangana government did issue directions for the release of the jewellery boxes. However, the situation took a dramatic turn when Agarwal discovered that the accused had allegedly secured the release of the jewellery solely in their own names, in violation of the MoU, and were attempting to sell it without honoring their commitment.

Agarwal has accused the two individuals of inducing him to invest through false promises and subsequently misappropriating his funds. It has also emerged during legal proceedings that while the execution of the MoU was acknowledged, the funds provided were not used for their intended purpose, further strengthening allegations of fraud and breach of trust.

Seeking legal remedy, Agarwal has filed a writ petition before the Telangana High Court and also initiated a civil suit in a local Hyderabad court. Through these legal actions, he has sought to secure his rightful share in the jewellery and to restrain the accused from selling or disposing of the assets.

The complainant has further alleged that during the pendency of these proceedings, he came to know that the funds he had invested were diverted for purposes unrelated to the release of the jewellery. This revelation has added a serious dimension to the case, pointing toward a possible larger financial conspiracy.

CCS Follows Money Trail as Fraud Probe Opens Bigger Conspiracy Angle

Considering the gravity of the allegations, the Central Crime Station (CCS) of Hyderabad police has registered a case and begun a detailed investigation. Authorities are now examining the financial trail, transactions involving the companies in question, and the actual status and whereabouts of the jewellery boxes. Investigators are also probing whether additional individuals or entities were involved in orchestrating the alleged fraud.

Preliminary findings suggest that the case may not be a simple commercial dispute but a well-planned economic offence involving deception, criminal conspiracy, and breach of trust. Officials believe that uncovering the complete money trail and establishing intent will be crucial in determining the full extent of the crime.

Legal experts note that if the allegations are proven, the case could have wider implications for corporate dealings and private investment agreements. It highlights the risks associated with large financial transactions conducted without robust due diligence and legal safeguards.

For now, investigators are focused on piecing together the sequence of events and identifying all those involved in the alleged scam. Further revelations are expected in the coming days, which could shed more light on how a deal promising high-value returns turned into a ₹50 crore fraud, leaving the investor entangled in a prolonged legal and financial battle.

Stay Connected