A corruption case has been registered against former Assistant Commissioner and Assistant Registrar of the Cooperative Department, Harendra Singh, over allegations of possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. The case was filed after an investigation found that his expenditure during the scrutiny period exceeded his declared income.
The matter originated from a complaint filed in 2020, accusing Harendra Singh of corruption and accumulating assets beyond his legitimate earnings. Following the complaint, authorities ordered a formal inquiry at the government level. After an extensive investigation, the report was submitted to the government in November 2025, after which approval was granted to initiate legal proceedings.
Income vs Expenditure Gap
According to the investigation report, Harendra Singh’s total known income during the review period was approximately ₹26.3 million, while his total expenditure during the same period was about ₹32.9 million. This resulted in an excess expenditure of roughly ₹6.857 million, which investigators said could not be explained through his declared sources of income.
Officials stated that the discrepancy between income and expenditure was identified after a detailed examination of financial documents, bank accounts, and other economic activities. Based on the findings, authorities concluded that the unexplained spending falls under the category of disproportionate assets, leading to the registration of a corruption case.
FCRF Launches Flagship Certified Fraud Investigator (CFI) Program
Harendra Singh served in the Cooperative Department for many years and had also held the position of Assistant Commissioner of Cooperatives in Meerut during his tenure. He is originally a resident of Kushinagar district. Following the registration of the case, authorities are expected to conduct a more detailed examination of his financial records and property details.
Legitimate Sources Claimed
Responding to the allegations, Harendra Singh stated that certain legitimate sources of income were not included during the investigation. He claimed that earnings from his agricultural activities, approximately ₹2.5 million generated by his son Himanshu Singh’s coaching institute, rental income from property, and loans taken from relatives were not properly accounted for in the inquiry.
He also said that he would present documentary evidence in court to clarify his financial position. According to him, if all legitimate sources of income are considered, the difference between his income and expenditure may appear significantly different.
Next Phase Court Dependent
Authorities indicated that the next phase of the case will depend on the evidence collected during the investigation and the documents presented before the court. Officials plan to scrutinize all financial records, banking transactions, and property documents to determine the exact reason behind the disparity in income and expenditure.
The administration has emphasized that cases involving corruption and disproportionate assets are treated seriously. Officials said thorough financial scrutiny is necessary in such matters to ensure accountability and transparency. The investigation is ongoing, and further legal action will be determined based on the evidence collected during the probe.
About the author – Rehan Khan is a law student and legal journalist with a keen interest in cybercrime, digital fraud, and emerging technology laws. He writes on the intersection of law, cybersecurity, and online safety, focusing on developments that impact individuals and institutions in India.
