Washington | A dispute that began over reheating a lunchbox meal on a US university campus has ended with two Indian doctoral scholars abandoning their PhD programmes and returning to India, following a legal settlement worth $200,000 (approximately ₹1.6 crore). The episode has reignited debate over cultural sensitivity and the lived realities of international students in American academic institutions.
The case involves Aditya Prakash, a doctoral student in anthropology, and Urmi Bhattacharya, another Indian research scholar, both formerly enrolled at the University of Colorado Boulder. According to court filings, the controversy dates back to September 5, 2023, when Prakash attempted to heat a home-cooked lunch—palak paneer—in a microwave located inside his department building.
The complaint states that a university staff member objected to the food, describing its smell as “offensive”, and asked Prakash to stop using the microwave immediately. Prakash responded that the food was ordinary, posed no harm, and that he would leave the area once it was heated. The exchange, the students allege, marked the beginning of a chain of administrative actions that ultimately derailed their academic careers.
Certified Cyber Crime Investigator Course Launched by Centre for Police Technology
Administrative scrutiny and pressure
Following the incident, the students claim they were subjected to sustained administrative scrutiny. Although Bhattacharya was not present during the initial confrontation, she said she was later drawn into the dispute and faced a hostile academic environment.
According to the lawsuit, multiple meetings were convened at the departmental and university levels to examine Prakash’s conduct. He was allegedly accused of making staff members feel “unsafe”, a charge the students strongly denied. Bhattacharya stated that her teaching assistantship—critical both to her academic standing and financial survival—was terminated without prior notice, placing her studies in jeopardy.
The students further alleged that other Indian scholars who brought home-cooked meals to campus were also questioned, with administrators suggesting that the group was deliberately attempting to provoke unrest. The complaint described this pattern as reflective of intolerance towards South Asian food habits and cultural practices.
Case reaches court
The dispute eventually reached a district court in Colorado, where both students filed a civil lawsuit alleging discrimination against individuals of South Asian origin. The petition argued that Indian and other international students were implicitly discouraged from bringing home-prepared food and were often forced to eat in isolation to avoid complaints.
After nearly two years of legal proceedings, the case was resolved through an out-of-court settlement. Under the terms of the agreement, the university agreed to pay $200,000 to the two students. However, the settlement also stipulated that while both would be awarded Master’s degrees, they would not be permitted to continue their PhD programmes. They are additionally barred from seeking future admission or any form of academic or non-academic employment at the university. University authorities did not admit any wrongdoing or discrimination as part of the settlement.
Return to India and personal cost
Following the settlement, both students returned to India earlier this month. Prakash is from Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh, while Bhattacharya hails from Kolkata. Prakash had been receiving a research grant for his doctoral work, while Bhattacharya depended on her teaching assistantship to fund her education and living expenses in the United States.
Reacting to the outcome, Prakash said the incident had fundamentally altered the course of his life. He noted that a routine act—reheating a meal—had escalated into a dispute that upended years of academic planning. Bhattacharya said the loss of her assistantship and the prolonged investigations caused severe mental distress and uncertainty about her future.
Both students said their families had invested their lifetime savings to support their higher education abroad, making the abrupt end to their doctoral studies a profound emotional and financial setback.
Support and wider debate
According to Prakash, more than 30 students from the department issued statements supporting the Indian scholars and calling for respect for cultural diversity on campus. Supporters argued that academic spaces should reflect multicultural realities and accommodate differences in everyday practices such as food, rather than penalising them.
Education experts say the case raises uncomfortable questions about how diversity and inclusion are implemented beyond policy statements in US universities. While the financial settlement offers limited compensation, they note that the academic disruption suffered by the students is irreversible.
“A PhD is not merely a qualification it is a long-term career pathway,” said an academic familiar with international education disputes. “Being forced to exit at this stage has consequences that extend far beyond monetary damages.”
For Prakash and Bhattacharya, the settlement brings formal closure to a prolonged dispute, but it also marks the end of an academic journey they had planned to complete in the United States.
