New Delhi: Bollywood actor and comedian Rajpal Yadav surrendered at Tihar Jail on Wednesday following strict directions from the Delhi High Court in a long-running cheque bounce case linked to a ₹5 crore loan taken for his directorial debut.
The High Court had earlier lifted the interim stay on his sentence and made it clear that Yadav must first surrender before seeking any relief. During the hearing, the actor appeared in person and submitted a cheque of ₹25 lakh, assuring the court that the remaining amount would be paid shortly. He also sought additional time to settle the dues.
Certified Cyber Crime Investigator Course Launched by Centre for Police Technology
The court, however, declined to grant any reprieve.
Observing that judicial leniency cannot be extended to those who fail to respect court orders, the bench said the law rewards compliance, not defiance. It directed Yadav to immediately surrender, adding that any future relief would be considered only on merit after custody.
Following the order, the actor presented himself before Tihar Jail authorities and formally surrendered.
₹5 crore loan for film project
The case dates back to 2010, when Yadav borrowed approximately ₹5 crore from Murli Projects Private Limited for the production of his directorial venture Ata Pata Laapata. According to the complainant, the amount was not repaid within the stipulated period.
Subsequently, Yadav allegedly issued multiple cheques towards repayment, all of which were dishonoured. This led the lending company to initiate criminal proceedings under cheque dishonour provisions.
A trial court later convicted the actor and sentenced him to six months’ imprisonment.
In 2024, the Delhi High Court temporarily stayed the sentence after Yadav assured the court that he would settle the outstanding amount as part of a compromise with the complainant. He was granted time to make payments, but court records indicate that the agreed terms were not honoured.
Court takes firm stand
During the latest hearing, the High Court noted that despite repeated opportunities, the actor had failed to comply with payment commitments. The bench made it clear that surrender was non-negotiable and that further hearings on any plea for relief would only take place after he was taken into custody.
With the stay on his conviction lifted, Yadav will now have to undergo the six-month sentence awarded by the trial court.
Legal observers say cheque bounce cases often see courts encouraging settlement between parties. However, persistent non-compliance and broken assurances leave little room for judicial discretion.
Prolonged legal battle
Sources familiar with the matter said Yadav had earlier provided multiple undertakings to clear the dues but failed to pay the full amount. The court viewed this as a serious disregard for judicial process.
Legal experts pointed out that while celebrities often seek negotiated settlements in financial disputes, courts are increasingly adopting a stricter approach when commitments are repeatedly breached.
The development serves as a reminder that financial liabilities enforced through legal orders must be honoured, regardless of an individual’s public stature.
Rajpal Yadav’s surrender brings a decisive turn to a case that has remained pending for over a decade, underscoring the judiciary’s resolve to ensure accountability in cheque dishonour matters.
About the author — Suvedita Nath is a science student with a growing interest in cybercrime and digital safety. She writes on online activity, cyber threats, and technology-driven risks. Her work focuses on clarity, accuracy, and public awareness.
