Lawyers at Patna High Court have resolved to indefinitely abstain from attending court proceedings under Acting Chief Justice P.B. Bajanthri as a protest against what they perceive as mishandling of an assault case involving two advocates. The decision was made unanimously by the Coordination Committee comprising the Advocate Association, Lawyers Association, and Bar Association of the High Court.
India to Honour Top CISOs from Police, Law Enforcement, and Defence Forces
Alleged Assault Triggers Protest
The controversy began when two lawyers, Ansul Aryan and his wife Manogya Singh, say they were attacked while heading to court. They allege the perpetrator was staff, security personnel, and the driver or conductor connected to a Delhi Public School. Aryan claims to have suffered physical injuries. Singh alleges verbal abuse, intimidation of a sexual nature, and that her phone was snatched and broken.
The incident was reported and initially heard by a Criminal Motion Bench, which directed the Station House Officer (SHO) from Rupaspur Police Station to appear in person. A suo motu criminal writ petition was also ordered, titled “In the matter of Assault on the Advocate,” after obtaining administrative permission.
Disagreement over Judicial Handling
When the case was later taken up by a bench presided over by the Acting Chief Justice and another judge, lawyers objected. The newer bench questioned whether the suo motu notice was maintainable without formal administrative approval or whether the Acting Chief Justice had jurisdiction in the administrative decisions made. Crucially, that bench reversed or cancelled the order requiring the SHO’s personal appearance, which has raised strong objections.
Lawyers argue that one bench cannot override or negate an order passed by another. They feel that the newer proceedings sidestep the real issue—ensuring accountability for the assault.
What It Means Going Forward
Starting from the morning of September 18, lawyers will refrain from appearing before the Acting Chief Justice’s court until they feel there has been satisfactory action. The resolution has been communicated to the Registrar General of the High Court.
The protest underscores growing tension between advocates and judicial administration when there is a perception of delay or inadequate action in cases involving alleged violence against lawyers. Many in the Bar see this as a matter of institutional respect, fairness and safety for legal professionals.