Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir: On April 22, 2025, India witnessed its deadliest civilian-targeted terrorist attack in over a decade, when 26 tourists, including a child and a Nepalese national, were brutally gunned down in Baisaran Valley, near the popular hill station of Pahalgam. The massacre has sent shockwaves across the country and raised deep concerns over the state of national security and intelligence preparedness.
The terror outfit The Resistance Front (TRF), widely believed to be a proxy of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, initially claimed responsibility but later retracted its statement, triggering suspicions of calculated disinformation tactics. Regardless, the attack has come to symbolize not just an act of terrorism but a catastrophic intelligence failure—one that occurred in a region considered among the most heavily patrolled and monitored in India.
ALSO READ: Call for Cyber Experts: Join FCRF Academy as Trainers and Course Creators
Security analysts have termed the attack a “zero-day” event, borrowing a phrase from the world of cybersecurity to describe an unforeseen, unpatched vulnerability exploited by adversaries. Despite ongoing efforts to project normalcy through tourism and infrastructure development in Kashmir, this incident has exposed the latent strength of dormant terror networks still operating in the shadows.
From Reaction to Prediction: Experts Advocate AI-Centric National Security Model
Criticism is mounting over India’s reactive security apparatus, which includes the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), Intelligence Bureau (IB), and the National Investigation Agency (NIA). While these agencies have historically been effective in post-event investigations, experts point out that they struggle with real-time threat anticipation and cross-agency integration.
Military deployments and soft-power initiatives like tourism promotion have their place, but, as the vulnerability of the remote Baisaran Valley revealed, India lacks the advanced surveillance and predictive systems needed in high-risk zones. Security experts argue that India must now transition from a manpower-centric model to a technology-first approach, using Artificial Intelligence (AI) as the cornerstone of modern counterterrorism.
Countries like Israel and the United States are leading examples of this shift. Israel’s Unit 8200 leverages AI for metadata analysis, behavioural pattern recognition, and satellite image scanning, enabling preemptive actions. Similarly, the US Department of Defense’s Project Maven utilizes AI to analyse drone surveillance footage in real-time, flagging threats and enabling timely intervention.
AI as India’s Counterterrorism Future: 5 Urgent Applications
India’s vast technological ecosystem—spanning DRDO, ISRO, and private-sector AI startups—offers the foundation to create homegrown counterterrorism AI platforms. However, what remains absent is strategic urgency and institutional coordination. Experts have outlined five immediate AI applications India must pursue:
-
Predictive Threat Modelling: AI systems can detect suspicious travel patterns, communication anomalies, and GPS trail deviations in remote areas like Baisaran.
-
Drone ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance): Smart drones with computer vision can patrol sensitive regions, alerting command centres to gatherings, weapon movement, or suspicious behaviour.
-
Biometric Surveillance: AI-powered facial recognition and thermal imaging can be deployed at checkpoints, hotels, and transit hubs to flag watchlisted individuals.
-
NLP for Threat Detection: AI trained in Kashmiri, Urdu, and Punjabi can monitor encrypted and open-source platforms for radical content or planning discussions.
-
Smart Borders: AI-enhanced border surveillance using thermal sensors and radar can detect infiltration in terrain-inaccessible areas and feed alerts to a centralized military intelligence dashboard.
Experts are also urging the formation of a National AI Command Centre—a centralized nodal agency that integrates data from intelligence services, state police, satellite feeds, cyber units, and border forces to enable real-time threat detection and unified action.
However, this push toward AI-led security must be balanced with safeguards for civil liberties. Parliamentary oversight, legal frameworks, and ethical AI protocols must govern how surveillance tools are deployed, particularly in civilian spaces.
National Tragedy Must Trigger Strategic Reform
India’s diplomatic responses, such as visa revocations, expulsions, and review of treaties like the Indus Water Treaty, send symbolic messages, but do not disrupt terror networks. The focus must now shift to technological supremacy, operational speed, and inter-agency cooperation.
The Pahalgam tragedy, much like the 2008 Mumbai attacks, should not fade into the news cycle. It must become a turning point in India’s counterterrorism doctrine—a moment where the country recognizes that in a world of algorithm-driven threats, it must fight back with algorithmic defense.
The path forward lies not just in boots on the ground, but in code, cameras, drones, and data—deployed responsibly, efficiently, and urgently.