Highlighting the growing threat of cybercrime, a magistrate court observed that cases of online fraud are far more serious in nature than traditional robbery or dacoity. The court rejected the bail pleas of three accused—19-year-old student Yash Thakur, Sahil Jain, and Haedar Sayyed—linked to a ₹3.74 crore cyber fraud case. The case was registered by the Economic Offences Branch of the central investigating agency, with six individuals accused of defrauding various persons and firms.
Court Rejects Bail
The court noted in its order that fraud carried out through digital means is not limited to financial loss alone but also deeply impacts the mental and social trust of the victims. The order mentioned that on a single day, 2 July 2025, the accused carried out multiple incidents, targeting nearly ten victims. Investigations revealed that the accused used fake digital arrests, online financial scams, and false claims related to customs authorities to cheat people.
FutureCrime Summit 2026: Registrations to Open Soon for India’s Biggest Cybercrime Conference
Cyber Fraud Tactics Exposed
While delivering the bail order, the court emphasized that the technical and organized nature of cybercrime cannot be taken lightly. It observed that perpetrators can commit fraud from different states or even countries, making investigation and prevention complex. Therefore, granting bail in such cases requires special caution.
According to investigating agencies, the accused used social engineering techniques to gain victims’ trust and then transferred money in multiple stages. They allegedly contacted victims via phone calls and online messages, posing as government officials to intimidate them, and then coerced them into paying money by creating fear of digital arrests.
Why Cybercrime is ‘More Dangerous’: Court’s Strong Observations
The court further noted that cybercrime is not just an economic offence but a significant social challenge in the modern era. With the expansion of digital payments and online services, the methods used by cybercriminals are constantly evolving. The judiciary indicated that granting bail in such cases could interfere with the investigative process, particularly when large sums and multiple victims are involved.
A total of six accused have already been chargesheeted in the case. They are alleged to have used fake identities to commit online fraud and extort money from individuals under the pretext of investments or government actions. According to officials, the gang operated in an organized manner, moving money across multiple accounts to make tracing difficult.
The court’s decision is being seen as a strict signal regarding cybercrime cases. Experts believe that in the digital era, the nature of crime has changed, and the law enforcement system must adapt accordingly. This ruling comes at a time when cases of online fraud and fake digital arrests are rising rapidly across the country.
About the author – Ayesha Aayat is a law student and contributor covering cybercrime, online frauds, and digital safety concerns. Her writing aims to raise awareness about evolving cyber threats and legal responses.
