The Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Centre, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) on a petition filed by a serving Lieutenant Colonel alleging large-scale corruption in procurement processes within the Indian Army. The officer has sought a court-monitored investigation and registration of an FIR into the allegations.
Allegations Of Procurement Irregularities
According to the petition, the officer alleged financial irregularities in procurement carried out under the Army’s Annual Contingent Grant. The plea claimed that public funds were siphoned through manipulated procurement procedures, falsified records, and diversion of government property. It also alleged that items purchased using public funds were misrepresented and procurement orders were split to avoid scrutiny and oversight mechanisms.
FCRF Launches Premier CISO Certification Amid Rising Demand for Cybersecurity Leadership
The officer stated that he had submitted complaints along with supporting documents identifying the officials allegedly involved in the irregularities, but no action was taken on the complaints. He alleged that the inaction allowed the irregularities to continue and evidence to be destroyed.
Plea Seeks Court-Monitored CBI Probe
The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking directions for the registration of an FIR by the CBI and a court-monitored investigation into the corruption allegations, including the constitution of an independent Special Investigation Team (SIT).
In the court order, the bench recorded:
“By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner, inter alia, seeks the registration of an FIR by the Central Bureau of Investigation [“CBI”] and a Court-monitored investigation by the CBI into the allegations of corruption raised by the petitioner, including the constitution of an independent Special Investigation Team [“SIT”]/CBI team.”
Allegations Of Retaliation And Unauthorised System Access
The officer also alleged that after filing complaints, he faced retaliation, including adverse performance reports and a transfer. The plea further alleged that his computer system was accessed without authorisation, raising concerns about possible unauthorised access to official data and whistleblower intimidation.
Court Issues Notice, Seeks Replies
The Delhi High Court issued notice to the respondents and directed them to file their replies within the stipulated time. The matter has been listed for further hearing on a later date after completion of pleadings.
The court’s notice marks the beginning of judicial scrutiny into the allegations, with the petition seeking an independent investigation into the alleged irregularities and related actions.
About the author – Ayesha Aayat is a law student and contributor covering cybercrime, online frauds, and digital safety concerns. Her writing aims to raise awareness about evolving cyber threats and legal responses.
