In recent years, the term dark patterns has moved from design circles into mainstream discussions on ethics, law, and consumer rights. At its core, a dark pattern is a deliberate design choice in a website, app, or digital platform that manipulates users into taking actions they did not fully intend — actions that often benefit the business at the user’s expense.
What Makes a Pattern ‘Dark’?
Not every persuasive design element is unethical. Good design helps users achieve their goals efficiently. Dark patterns, however, exploit cognitive biases, hide important choices, or make opting out unnecessarily difficult. Examples include:
- Hidden opt-outs: Burying the “Cancel” or “Decline” button in fine print or behind multiple clicks.
- Confirm shaming: Guilt-tripping language like “No thanks, I don’t want to save money.”
- Forced continuity: Starting a paid subscription after a free trial without clear reminders.
- Basket sneaking: Adding extra items to a cart by default.
These techniques prey on user psychology to increase conversion rates, subscriptions, or data sharing — often without meaningful consent.
FCRF Launches India’s Premier Certified Data Protection Officer Program Aligned with DPDP Act
Legal and Regulatory Landscape in India
India is beginning to formally address this issue. In 2023, the Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns were introduced by the Department of Consumer Affairs, prohibiting misleading interface practices. These guidelines align with global movements — the European Union’s Digital Services Act and the US Federal Trade Commission’s enforcement efforts — to make online platforms more transparent and user-centric.
The guidelines specifically identify practices like false urgency, drip pricing, and disguised ads as prohibited. Organizations failing to comply may face penalties, reputational damage, and loss of consumer trust.
The GRC Perspective
For Governance, Risk, and Compliance professionals, dark patterns are more than a UX issue — they are a compliance and brand risk. Using manipulative design could:
- Breach data privacy regulations if it leads to coerced consent.
- Trigger consumer protection law violations.
- Damage trust with stakeholders and customers.
GRC teams should work closely with product managers, designers, and legal teams to review interface flows, consent mechanisms, and opt-out processes. A compliance-first approach ensures that persuasive design remains ethical and defensible.
Building Ethical Design Practices
- Transparent choices: Present all options clearly, without hidden consequences.
- Informed consent: Ensure consent is freely given, specific, and revocable.
- User testing with ethics in mind: Evaluate whether users feel misled during interactions.
- Periodic audits: Review interfaces for compliance with evolving guidelines.
Final Thoughts
Dark patterns erode the foundation of trust between users and digital services. In a regulatory environment that is becoming increasingly strict, organizations can no longer afford to rely on manipulative design to drive metrics. Ethical design isn’t just good compliance — it’s a good business.