Serious allegations have been leveled against former IPS officer Amitabh Thakur and his wife Nutan Thakur, with a fresh FIR registered at Talkatora police station, Lucknow. According to the complaint, Nutan Thakur allegedly acquired an industrial plot in Deoria’s industrial area in 1999 under a fake name and address, later selling it in her real name to make profits.
The complainant has demanded a CBI or SIT probe, citing the scale and seriousness of the alleged wrongdoing.
Fake Identity and Plot Allotment
The complaint states that Nutan Thakur applied for plot number B-2 under the name “Nutan Devi, wife of Abhijat Thakur, Village Khaira, District Sitamarhi, Bihar.” Documents such as the application form, affidavit, treasury challan, and transfer deed were allegedly prepared using this false identity.
FCRF Academy Invites Legal Experts to Shape India’s First Comprehensive Cyber Law Certification
The plot was later transferred and sold in her actual name, allegedly demonstrating a fraudulent process to gain unlawful benefit.
Role of Amitabh Thakur in the Allegations
At the time of the alleged incident in 1999, Amitabh Thakur was serving as the Superintendent of Police in Deoria. The complaint accuses him of misusing his position by:
- Failing to file an FIR despite knowing about the irregularities.
- Using his influence to pressure officials to allot the plot.
- Facilitating the process that allowed the transition from a fake identity to a genuine sale.
This, the complainant argues, constitutes an abuse of authority.
Documentary Evidence Submitted
The complaint includes 18 different types of documents to substantiate the charges. These reportedly include:
- Application forms and affidavits filed with fake details.
- Treasury challan receipts.
- Transfer deeds and allotment orders.
- Industry center meeting minutes.
- Subsequent sale papers showing transfer from a fake identity to Nutan Thakur’s real name.
Investigators are expected to scrutinize these documents as part of the inquiry.
Legal Framework and Demands for Action
The case references multiple provisions under Indian law, including:
- Benami Property Transactions Act
- Prevention of Corruption Act
- Income Tax Act
- IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 166, and 217
The complainant has demanded not only punitive measures under these laws but also:
- Departmental action against officials who aided the allotment.
- Seizure of property and stoppage of pension benefits.
- Arrest of the accused to ensure impartial investigation.
Broader Allegations and Call for Probe
According to the complaint, the case is not limited to a single plot. Instead, it signals a possible wider conspiracy to accumulate benami property on a large scale. The complainant insists that only an independent investigation by agencies like the CBI, SIT, or CBCID can ensure transparency and accountability.
Implications
If proven, the allegations could raise serious questions about misuse of official position, benami transactions, and corruption within law enforcement ranks. The case could also have broader implications for accountability mechanisms meant to prevent officers from leveraging their authority for personal gain.
For now, the FIR marks the beginning of a legal process that may test not just the evidence at hand but also the state’s willingness to pursue action against powerful former officials.