The Supreme Court of India strongly reprimanded Bollywood actor and filmmaker Rajpal Yadav during proceedings on October 5 for failing to comply with court directions regarding financial commitments in a long-standing cheque bounce dispute involving approximately ₹7.5 crore. Expressing acute dissatisfaction over the non-fulfilment of conditions attached to his earlier release, the court indicated that it was inclined to dismiss Yadav’s petition entirely. The bench refrained from immediate dismissal solely to preserve the prospect of financial recovery for the complainant, granting the actor a final deadline until tomorrow to clear the required sum before the matter returns to the top of the board on October 7.
Bench Questions Photocopy of Demand Draft and Counsel Conduct
During the hearing, Yadav’s legal team submitted a photocopy of a demand draft valued at ₹50 lakh, which immediately drew rigorous scrutiny from the bench. Justice Joymalya Bagchi questioned Yadav’s counsel on the authenticity of the records, the exact status of the payment, and the continued disregard of previous judicial instructions. The submission of secondary documentation rather than confirmed deposits provoked sharp remarks from the bench, with Justice Bagchi stating that such arrogance had to be put in its proper place and remarking that counsel should know when to speak.
The court reiterated that it was scrutinizing compliance strictly because the proceedings had been maintained to secure funds for the aggrieved entity. On September 15, the Supreme Court had granted Yadav release from custody under the specific condition that a deposit of ₹5 crore be made. With the terms of that directive remaining unfulfilled weeks later, the judges warned that repeated non-adherence would leave them with no alternative but to reject Yadav’s petition and withdraw judicial protection.
Film Financing Dispute Behind Years of Legal Proceedings
The dispute originates from commercial transactions in 2010, when Yadav obtained ₹5 crore from Murli Projects Pvt Ltd to finance the production of his directorial debut feature, Aata Pata Laapata. Under the initial commercial arrangement, the principal amount was to be refunded according to contractually established schedules. However, after the cinematic release underperformed commercially, Yadav sustained heavy financial deficits and defaulted on his obligations to the lending entity.
Cheques subsequently tendered toward the settlement of the liabilities were dishonoured upon presentation, prompting Murli Projects Pvt Ltd to initiate legal action under cheque bounce statutes. The dispute escalated across various judicial forums over the following decade, culminating in orders for Yadav to be remanded to judicial custody before he approached the apex court for relief.
Supreme Court Grants Strict Twenty-Four-Hour Compliance Window
Faced with the unresolved claims, the Supreme Court deferred a final order to allow a narrow, final opening for monetary settlement. Rather than summarily shutting down Yadav’s appeal, the bench set a strict deadline of October 6 for him to deposit the required funds, noting that the primary goal remains ensuring that the complainant recovers its money.
The court has scheduled the next hearing for October 7, where the case will be listed as the primary matter on the daily cause list. At that stage, the bench will review whether Yadav has met the payment obligations or whether coercive measures, including the dismissal of his petition, will follow.
Follow for daily updates on cybercrime, corporate fraud, DFIR, hacking, investigations, and digital forensics
