New Delhi/Mumbai: Shares of private sector lender IDFC FIRST Bank tumbled sharply on Monday after the disclosure of a ₹590 crore suspected fraud linked to a Chandigarh branch, eroding nearly ₹14,000 crore in market capitalisation and triggering a sell-off across the counter.
The stock fell as much as 20% during intraday trade, nearing the lower circuit, and slipped to around ₹47.90 — its lowest level in several months. The decline came despite broader market stability, with the Nifty-50 showing only marginal movement during the same period. So far in 2026, the bank’s shares have dropped about 22%, significantly underperforming the benchmark index.
The lender said the irregularities were detected in accounts related to a state government entity, where unauthorised transactions were allegedly carried out through fraudulent cheques and manual entries at the branch level. Following an internal review, four employees have been suspended and a forensic audit has been initiated.
Certified Cyber Crime Investigator Course Launched by Centre for Police Technology
Governance Concerns and Sector Spillover
Market participants reacted swiftly to the development, with heavy selling pressure reflecting concerns over internal controls and governance standards. Analysts noted that the suspected fraud amount is roughly equivalent to about a quarter of the bank’s annual net profit, amplifying investor anxiety.
The bank, however, maintained that the incident was isolated and confined to a single branch. It said regulatory protocols were being followed and that steps had been taken to contain the financial impact. Lien marks have been placed on certain accounts and recovery efforts are underway.
Governance Concerns and Sector Spillover
The episode had a spillover effect on the broader banking space, with select small finance bank stocks also witnessing declines as investors reassessed risk in the sector. Market experts said such incidents tend to raise systemic concerns about operational oversight, particularly in accounts involving government transactions and manual processing.
Preliminary findings suggest that the fraud involved bypassing automated checks through manual intervention in cheque processing and ledger entries. The case has highlighted vulnerabilities in branch-level controls and the need for stronger real-time reconciliation mechanisms, especially for high-value accounts.
Financial sector observers pointed out that despite the rapid digitisation of banking operations, legacy manual processes continue to pose risks if not backed by robust supervisory layers. Strengthening maker-checker controls, audit trails and exception reporting systems would be critical to preventing similar occurrences, they said.
Forensic Audit and Investor Watch
The bank has assured stakeholders that corrective measures will be implemented and accountability fixed once the forensic review is completed. It also indicated that internal control systems would be reinforced to prevent recurrence.
Investors are now closely tracking the progress of the audit, potential recovery of funds and any regulatory response, all of which are expected to influence the stock’s near-term trajectory. Analysts said a swift and transparent resolution could help restore confidence, while delays or larger-than-expected losses may prolong pressure on the counter.
