NEW DELHI: An FIR naming 42 individuals, invoked under some of India’s strictest criminal and cyber laws, has pushed an online harassment complaint by a television anchor into a wider reckoning over AI-driven abuse and accountability on social media.
A Complaint That Escalated Quickly
What began as an allegation of online trolling has evolved into a large cybercrime investigation after police registered a First Information Report against 42 individuals, invoking stringent provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act.
The case stems from a complaint filed by Tollywood actress and television anchor Anasuya Bharadwaj, who approached the police alleging sustained online harassment, including sexualised abuse and the circulation of morphed and fabricated content. Law-enforcement officials said the seriousness of the allegations and the volume of material cited in the complaint prompted the registration of a case under multiple penal provisions.
Certified Cyber Crime Investigator Course Launched by Centre for Police Technology
According to police, the FIR includes IPC Sections 75 and 79, along with Sections 336(4), 351 and 356, as well as Sections 66E and 67 of the IT Act—sections typically applied in cases involving sexual harassment, defamation, violation of privacy and the online circulation of obscene material.
The Allegations Behind the FIR
In her complaint, Bharadwaj stated that she was not merely facing criticism or trolling, but was being targeted through explicit sexual comments, threats and the circulation of obscene videos across social media platforms. She alleged that some of the content had been digitally altered or created using artificial intelligence tools, and was shared with the intent to damage her reputation.
The complaint describes the alleged campaign as sustained and coordinated, asserting that the circulation of such material had placed her personal safety and professional standing at risk. Bharadwaj told investigators that the impact extended beyond emotional distress, framing the alleged acts as a direct attack on her livelihood and public life.
Police officials familiar with the case said the complaint included references to multiple social-media posts and accounts, which formed the basis for identifying the individuals named in the FIR.
Laws Invoked and Their Implications
The sections cited in the case are among the more severe provisions available for addressing online sexual harassment and cybercrime. Section 66E of the IT Act deals with violations of privacy, particularly the capture or transmission of private images without consent, while Section 67 pertains to the publication or transmission of obscene content in electronic form.
Combined with the IPC provisions, the charges reflect an attempt by investigators to address both the digital nature of the alleged offences and their offline consequences, including reputational harm and personal safety concerns. Legal experts note that such a combination of sections is often used when harassment crosses from speech into targeted abuse involving sexualised or fabricated material.
