Norway : Norwegian authorities are investigating an unusual surge in betting on the Nobel Peace Prize—an activity so precisely timed, and so profitable, that officials suspect someone may have leaked the name of the winner before the official announcement
A Surge Before the Silence Broke
Hours before the Norwegian Nobel Committee revealed that Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado had won this year’s Peace Prize, an unexpected flurry of wagers hit the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket. Machado’s odds, which had lingered near 3.75%, suddenly shot to over 70% by dawn in Oslo.
The betting spike, worth tens of thousands of dollars, was so sharp that the Norwegian Nobel Institute now considers the possibility of a data breach—or even espionage. Committee secretary Kristian Berg Harpviken confirmed on Monday that a formal probe was underway, citing the “highly unusual” timing of the activity.
FCRF Launches CCLP Program to Train India’s Next Generation of Cyber Law Practitioners
Betting on Secrets
At the heart of the investigation is Polymarket, a blockchain-based prediction app that allows users to trade shares on the outcomes of real-world events—from elections to celebrity scandals. The platform, recently valued at around ₹7037 crores ($8 billion), operates globally after being restricted in the United States in 2022 for regulatory reasons.
Each share represents a bet on a binary question—yes or no, win or lose—and prices fluctuate with public speculation. While prediction markets often serve as indicators of collective sentiment, this case may represent something far different: the monetization of privileged information about one of the world’s most secretive institutions.
One account wagered roughly ₹61 lakhs($70,000) on Machado’s win just hours before the official announcement, reportedly netting around ₹26 lakhs ($30,000) in profit. Two additional accounts focused exclusively on her candidacy, collectively earning close to ₹79 lakhs ($90,000). None of the three had a prior betting history.
Cracks in a Fortress of Secrecy
The Nobel Peace Prize selection process is designed to be opaque. Only a five-member committee—and a small circle of advisers—know the winner before the announcement. Even nominees and their advocates remain in the dark.
That system of confidentiality has long been a point of pride, meant to shield deliberations from lobbying or influence. The apparent correlation between insider betting and the final result now threatens to erode that reputation.
“The fact that Machado was not considered a frontrunner in the press makes this especially suspicious,” said one European academic who studies transparency in global institutions. “It’s not the kind of name the public would have guessed.”
The Digital Shadow Around the Prize
The investigation has drawn attention to a growing gray area between blockchain markets and information security. Platforms like Polymarket—and its U.S. equivalent, Kalshi—blur the lines between prediction and speculation, with millions of dollars riding on outcomes that hinge on sensitive or private knowledge.
While official betting markets exist for sports and elections, experts say a Nobel Prize leak, if confirmed, would represent a new frontier in cybercrime—where even the sanctity of an award meant to honor peace becomes a tool for profit. For now, the Nobel Committee remains silent as auditors trace the flow of digital currency through decentralized ledgers.
