Is Polymorphism the Future of Malware?

Introducing ‘Nirorat’ A Python-Based Trojan That Evades Detection With Advanced Self-Modification

Shakti Sharma
4 Min Read

A newly identified cyber threat, a Python-based Remote Access Trojan (RAT) named nirorat.py, has sent a jolt through the cybersecurity community. Experts warn the malware represents a step forward in the arms race between hackers and defenders, as its core design is built for dynamic evasion, rendering most traditional, signature-based antivirus software ineffective. Uploaded to VirusTotal with a SHA256 signature of 7173e20e7ec2l7f6a1591flfc9be6d0a4496d78615cc5ccdf7b9a3a37e3ecc3c, the RAT currently scores alarmingly low on detection metrics, confirming its ability to camouflage itself. This “high-risk threat” is defined by its use of advanced polymorphic (multi-form) and self-modifying capabilities, relying on the sophisticated exploitation of Python’s own runtime features.

The Self-Modifying Engine: A Digital Disguise

The core of nirorat’s evasion lies in a cunning “self-modifying and packing mechanism.” This process is designed to ensure that the malware’s file signature is unique every time it runs, effectively neutralizing static analysis. The RAT begins by using Python’s inspect module to retrieve its own source code while executing. Within a function dubbed self_modifying_wrapper(), it treats its critical routines, such as the main payload, as data. It then applies an XOR-encoding and a process that simulates a compression/decompression cycle using the zlib and marshal modules. The original source is then executed in memory via the exec() function. This dynamic transformation is logged and ensures each run appears as a unique binary, mimicking a legitimate software packer.

The Polymorphic Pipeline: Code Obfuscation

Beyond changing its signature, nirorat employs an aggressive “Advanced Polymorphic Obfuscation Pipeline” to complicate human and automated analysis. This process involves the polymorph_code() function, which systematically destroys the code’s readability and structure. First, it renames all variables randomly. It then injects extraneous, non-functional code—”junk snippets”—such as unused functions, empty list comprehensions, and randomized time.sleep() calls and empty try/except blocks at arbitrary positions. Finally, it extracts, shuffles, and re-merges function definitions. These structural alterations thwart static analysis, making it nearly impossible for a security analyst to follow the code’s original logic.

FCRF Launches CCLP Program to Train India’s Next Generation of Cyber Law Practitioners

A Comprehensive Attack Surface

Once executed, nirorat transforms into a full-featured remote access trojan, offering attackers a wide array of capabilities. The malware’s “attack surface” is extensive, combining network propagation, command-and-control functionality, and data exfiltration.

Its capabilities include:

  1. Network Propagation: Functions like socket_network_scan() and spread_to_network() enable lateral movement across a target’s internal systems.
  2. Intrusion: Attempts to brute-force network devices with routines such as test_default_credentials().
  3. Surveillance: The ability to take a screenshot(), record_screen_webcam(), and capture audio().
  4. Command & Control (C2): Functionality for executing shell commands, file upload/download, and gathering system information.
  5. Unique Feature: The malware integrates a Discord bot interface, allowing attackers to issue commands. Notably, it includes a command /xworm for dropping a secondary payload from an external URL, and /encrypt for file encryption, suggesting potential future ransomware capabilities.

Mitigation and Defense Shifts

To combat this evolving threat, security defenders must abandon reliance on file signatures and pivot to behavioral analysis. Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) point to specific activities that can be monitored:

  1. Monitoring Python Processes: Defenders must monitor Python processes for the dynamic invocation of inspect.getsource() and unexpected use of marshal.loads().
  2. Behavioral Red Flags: Frequent imports of the zlib module paired with random delays, which are indicative of the unpacking and obfuscation pipeline, are critical signs of compromise.
  3. Recommended Action: Experts strongly recommend performing file integrity checks on Python scripts combined with rigorous runtime behavioral analysis within sandboxed environments to detect and mitigate this sophisticated, polymorphic malware.

Stay Connected