The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has leased a luxury Prabhadevi apartment in Mumbai for its chairman at ₹7 lakh per month. While the regulator insists the arrangement follows board-approved policy, critics say it highlights broader questions of transparency, fairness, and optics at a time when millions of Indian families struggle with rising costs.
A Luxury Address for India’s Top Market Regulator
SEBI’s chairman, Tuhin Kanta Pandey, has moved into a 5-bedroom apartment on the 51st floor of Rustomjee Crown in Prabhadevi, one of Mumbai’s most exclusive residential complexes. The apartment, with a carpet area of 3,000 sq. ft., overlooks the Arabian Sea and comes with four car parks and a security deposit of ₹42 lakh.
FutureCrime Summit 2026: Registrations to Open Soon for India’s Biggest Cybercrime Conference
The lease, signed on September 3, locks SEBI into a three-year commitment with an annual 5% escalation clause. Real estate analysts estimate the unit falls squarely within Mumbai’s luxury rental market, typically reserved for high-net-worth individuals and corporate executives.
Policy and Pay: A Question of Structure
According to SEBI, the lease complies with a board-approved accommodation policy that entitles its chairman and senior members to rent-free, unfurnished housing or compensation in the form of House Rent Allowance (HRA) and 10% of basic pay.
At the time of appointment, Pandey had the choice of a consolidated salary of ₹5.62 lakh per month or the government pay scale. The current lease suggests SEBI is footing the housing bill directly, effectively aligning his overall package with a Secretary-level officer of the Government of India — a role where official salaries rarely exceed ₹2.25 lakh per month.
The regulator defended the arrangement, citing both board policy and an independent valuation report from a leading property valuer to confirm that the lease amount is within the “approved limit.”
Optics of Public Spending in a Time of Strain
The move has drawn mixed reactions. Supporters argue that heading India’s capital markets watchdog — overseeing trillions in market capitalization and safeguarding millions of investors — warrants executive-level housing that reflects the gravity of the role.
Critics, however, point to the optics: the chairman of a regulator designed to uphold transparency and protect investors now living in a luxury apartment funded by public resources. The ₹7 lakh rent, they argue, stands in stark contrast to the financial realities faced by ordinary Indians and raises uncomfortable questions about whether public institutions should mirror private corporate lifestyles.
