In a rare public expression of dissatisfaction, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, during his first official visit to his home state of Maharashtra after assuming office, raised concern over a “protocol lapse” after senior state officials failed to receive him on arrival. Gavai, who was in Mumbai to attend a felicitation event organized by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, noted the absence of key figures such as the Chief Secretary, Director General of Police, and the Mumbai Police Commissioner.
“When a person from Maharashtra becomes the Chief Justice of India and visits Maharashtra for the first time, if the Chief Secretary, the DGP, or the Mumbai Police Commissioner don’t feel it appropriate to be present, then they need to reflect on that,” the CJI said, his tone underscoring disappointment more than indignation.
The incident has triggered discussions around the respect extended by the executive branch to members of the judiciary, especially in the context of constitutional decorum and federal conduct.
Protocol is Not a Formality, It’s a Symbol
While addressing the legal fraternity at the event, CJI Gavai reiterated that protocol is not about formality or hierarchy, but about mutual recognition of constitutional authority. “Protocols are not something new—it’s a question of the respect one constitutional body gives to another,” he remarked, drawing a link between institutional civility and democratic function.
ALSO READ: Attention Startups! Showcase Your Smart Policing Solutions on India’s Biggest Stage
Gavai, the second Dalit ever to hold the post of Chief Justice of India, subtly invoked Article 142 of the Constitution—which grants the Supreme Court sweeping powers to ensure complete justice—to make his point. “If in my place there was someone else, then the provisions of Article 142 would be considered,” he said in a lighter vein, hinting at the seriousness of the matter without escalating it.
Larger Implications and Political Undertones
The absence of state dignitaries at an event celebrating the appointment of the country’s top judicial officer, who also hails from Maharashtra, has ignited political murmurs. While no official explanation has been offered yet for the absence of the state’s top brass, political observers are interpreting the incident as a potential strain between the judiciary and executive in the state.
CJI Gavai, known for his measured tone and emphasis on institutional dignity, made it clear that his remarks were not personal but procedural. Yet, by highlighting the breach publicly, he ensured the message was delivered loud and clear.