The Supreme Court of India has clarified that just because a public servant misuses their authority does not mean they are corrupt. The court ruled that for someone to be presumed guilty under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PC Act), there must be clear proof that they both demanded and accepted a bribe.
What Did the Court Say?
The ruling was made in response to a case where a government official was accused of giving out contracts without following proper procedures, which allegedly caused financial loss to the state. The official was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for misuse of authority. However, the Supreme Court noted that while such actions may be improper, they do not automatically count as corruption unless there is proof that the official personally benefited by taking a bribe.
The judges emphasized that under Section 20 of the PC Act, a public servant is presumed guilty only if there is clear evidence that they took an illegal advantage in return for a favor.
The Case Details
- The case involved an appellant-public servant who allegedly violated government policies by awarding fishing contracts without a proper tender process.
- The High Court refused to dismiss the case, stating that the official’s actions caused financial losses.
- The official then appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that there was no evidence to prove that he had demanded or accepted a bribe.
Supreme Court’s Final Decision
The Supreme Court, led by Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K Vinod Chandran, ruled that merely misusing authority is not enough to prove corruption. The court explained that a presumption of corruption only arises if there is proof of bribe demand and acceptance.
In its judgment, the court referred to the Neeraj Dutta v. State (2022) case, where it was established that proof of both demand and acceptance of a bribe is necessary for corruption charges.
Since no such proof was available, the Supreme Court dropped the corruption charges against the official.
Key Takeaways from the Ruling
- Misuse of power does not always mean corruption.
- Under the Prevention of Corruption Act, proof of demand and acceptance of a bribe is necessary.
- Government officials can only be convicted of corruption if there is clear evidence of illegal gratification.
The ruling sets an important precedent, making it clear that public servants cannot be presumed guilty just because they misuse their authority—unless there is solid evidence of bribery.
Follow The420.in on
Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and YouTube