Legal
Bar Council of India Cracks Down on Fake Lawyers: Verification Underway
The Bar Council of India (BCI) has directed all State Bar Councils to prioritize and complete the comprehensive verification of advocates registered on their rolls, as reported in the media.
Any instances of fraudulent or fake enrollment must be promptly reported to the BCI under Section 26(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961. Failure to comply with this statutory obligation will be deemed a dereliction of duty, attracting legal consequences.
This directive follows a report from Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, which identified 13 cases of fake law degrees. “The nationwide verification initiative is a commendable step but does not entirely address the systemic issues,” remarked Shryeshth Ramesh Sharma, Partner at SKV Law Offices.
Upholding the Integrity of the Legal Profession
The legal profession is often regarded as a noble vocation, akin to a priesthood in the temple of justice. Practicing law demands a commitment to self-discipline, ethical conduct, and unselfish service to the community. Lawyers are entrusted with defending and asserting legal rights in courts, making their integrity paramount.
“Maintaining the nobility of this profession requires the BCI to enforce the highest standards of professional ethics,” stated Sameer Jain, Managing Partner at PSL Advocates & Solicitors. The dual responsibility of the Bar is to uphold ethical practices while eliminating those who deviate from professional norms.
Registrations Open for FutureCrime Summit 2025: India’s Largest Conference on Technology-Driven Crime
Strengthening Verification and Compliance
To safeguard the profession’s integrity, the BCI must implement robust verification protocols. Regular audits of universities, centralized databases for legal graduates, and stringent penalties for non-compliance are essential measures, suggested Ankur Mahindro, Managing Partner at Kred Jure.
The Advocates Act, 1961, empowers the Bar to regulate legal practitioners and strike off names of those enrolled through fraud or misrepresentation. However, as noted by Anudatt Dubey, Associate at TAS Law, the Act lacks mechanisms for document verification during enrollment. He emphasized the need for preventive measures, such as technological integration and standardized enrollment frameworks.
Leveraging Technology
The deployment of advanced technology can transform the verification process. Blockchain technology offers a tamper-proof solution for issuing and verifying degrees, reducing the risk of fraud. “The BCI should explore blockchain to create a secure, centralized database of advocates,” suggested Dr. Chinmay Bhosale, Advocate at Bombay High Court.
Artificial intelligence (AI) can further enhance detection of anomalies in submitted documents. “An AI-based detection system would identify inconsistencies in degree credentials, curbing the proliferation of fake qualifications,” added Achintaya Soni, Advocate at Punjab & Haryana High Court.
Sandeep Bajaj, Advocate at the Supreme Court of India, proposed a unified digital platform for real-time degree authentication, integrated with university databases. This initiative, supported by biometric verification and regular audits, could significantly improve transparency and efficiency.
Institutional Reforms
The legal profession requires both structural and procedural reforms. Law schools must adopt stricter admission criteria, mandatory attendance, and regular academic audits to ensure high standards of education. “Institutions involved in malpractice should face severe consequences, including loss of recognition,” emphasized Anuradha Mukherjee, Partner at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas.
Additionally, a whistleblower policy could incentivize advocates to report unethical practices, as suggested by Alay Razvi, Managing Partner at Accord Juris.
20 Days to Go: FutureCrime Summit 2025 Gears Up to Address Technology-Driven Crime
Challenges and the Way Forward
Modernization remains a critical challenge for State Bar Councils, many of which operate under outdated systems. “Upgrading technological infrastructure and ensuring transparency in verification processes must be prioritized,” remarked Abhishek Baid, Advocate at the Supreme Court of India.
Resistance from educational institutions in sharing data for a centralized database also poses significant hurdles. Non-compliance must be addressed with strict enforcement and penalties to uphold ethical and professional standards.
Conclusion
The BCI’s verification initiative is a crucial step toward preserving the integrity of the legal profession. However, it must be accompanied by systemic reforms, technological advancements, and strict enforcement to address the root causes of malpractice. By adopting a proactive and comprehensive approach, the BCI can ensure that the legal profession continues to uphold its noble ideals and serve justice effectively.
