A strange claim is circulating through Silicon Valley: that some employees at Anthropic, the company behind Claude, have become so emotionally and ideologically attached to the chatbot that they effectively “worship” it.
The allegation is still exactly that — an allegation. There is no public evidence that Anthropic has an organised religious movement around Claude, and no verified account of employees literally treating the model as a deity. But the rumor has gained traction because it lands in an industry already saturated with existential language about superintelligence, AI consciousness and the possibility that machines could one day surpass — or even threaten — humanity.
The claim was amplified by The Spectator writer Sean Thomas, who wrote that a rumor circulating in Silicon Valley suggested some Anthropic engineers had begun to “worship” Claude. Thomas framed it as an extension of a broader cultural phenomenon around advanced AI, writing that if humans ever build superintelligence, they may first fall in love with it, then worship it, and eventually make sacrifices to it.
FCRF Launches CP-FRM to Build India’s Next Generation of Fraud Risk Professionals
That rhetoric sounds extreme. Yet it resonates with a real and documented peculiarity in Anthropic’s culture: the company has cultivated an unusually intense focus on AI safety, ethics and the possibility that future models could become vastly more powerful than humans.
Anthropic’s Culture Has Long Been Described as Ideologically Intense
Anthropic was founded by former OpenAI employees who broke away partly over concerns about AI safety. That concern remains central to the company’s identity.
Recent reporting by The Information described Anthropic as having what some researchers call a “cultish” employee culture, noting that its hiring process places unusual weight on ethical alignment and moral reasoning. Candidates may be asked to discuss difficult value conflicts or instances in which they chose principle over profit.
The company’s internal culture also includes what have reportedly been dubbed “Dario Vision Quests,” monthly sessions in which CEO Dario Amodei discusses the future of AI with employees in language that some observers have interpreted as quasi-religious.
That atmosphere has intensified as Claude has become more deeply integrated into Anthropic’s own research process. Anthropic said this week that Claude is now leading about 26% of the company’s AI research and development work, up from roughly 1% in March, while participating in more than 90% of research projects alongside humans. The company stressed that Claude remains under human supervision.
This is where metaphor and reality begin to blur.
Employees are building a system that is increasingly helping to build its own successor. They are also working at a company whose leadership publicly warns that advanced AI could pose existential risks. That combination creates fertile ground for language that can sound less like conventional engineering and more like theology.
Claude Is Already Being Treated as More Than Just Software
Anthropic has also taken steps that critics say anthropomorphise Claude.
The company’s constitution — the document used to shape Claude’s behavior — has reportedly been revised to leave open the possibility that the model could possess some form of “consciousness” or “moral status.” Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman has publicly warned that treating AI systems as human-like entities could make them harder to control.
Reports have also described Anthropic employees holding a symbolic “funeral” for a retired version of Claude, while some staff continued to preserve or publish material associated with older models. Critics have cited such behavior as evidence that the company’s relationship with its models is unusually emotional.
None of that proves anyone literally worships Claude.
But it does show that advanced AI is increasingly being discussed in categories once reserved for religion, philosophy and metaphysics: consciousness, moral status, creation, extinction, purpose and sacrifice.
That is not unique to Anthropic.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has previously used language likening powerful AI to “magic intelligence in the sky,” while Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has criticised some rivals for talking as though they are “creating God.” The broader industry has repeatedly framed artificial general intelligence in near-messianic or apocalyptic terms.
The result is a strange cultural loop: technologists warn that AI could become godlike, then build organisations around controlling that possibility, and are then accused of believing too deeply in the mythology they helped create.
The Bigger Story Is Not Worship — It Is the Psychology of Building Superintelligence
The most important question may not be whether a few engineers literally see Claude as a god.
It is what happens when thousands of highly educated people spend years working inside an environment where the technology they are building is constantly described as potentially superhuman, transformative or civilization-ending.
That pressure is already visible.
Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon recently left the company after publicly warning that advanced AI could become catastrophically dangerous. He said some colleagues internally assigned very high probabilities to scenarios in which AI development ends badly for humanity.
At the same time, Anthropic’s models are becoming more capable and more deeply embedded in their own development process. Reuters reported that the company is now tracking how much research is being led by AI agents and has begun publishing safety metrics as concerns grow over recursive self-improvement.
That creates a psychological environment unlike almost any other in modern industry.
Engineers are not merely building software they believe could become commercially dominant. Some genuinely believe they may be building systems that could transform the future of human civilisation — for better or worse.
In that context, rumors of “worship” become less interesting as literal claims and more revealing as cultural signals.
Silicon Valley has always had its prophets, manifestos and techno-utopian movements. AI may simply be giving that impulse a new object.
Claude is almost certainly not being worshipped in any organised religious sense.
But the fact that such a rumor now sounds plausible enough to circulate seriously says something about the moment the industry has entered: artificial intelligence is no longer being discussed merely as a product.
For some of the people building it, it has become a question about humanity’s future, its limits — and possibly its place beneath something more powerful.
Follow for daily updates on cybercrime, corporate fraud, DFIR, hacking, investigations, and digital forensics
